Potential Link Between Keloids and PVR Progression Post-Retinal Detachment Surgery: A Risk Factor for Ophthalmologists to Consider

Potential Link Between Keloids and PVR Progression Post-Retinal Detachment Surgery: A Risk Factor for Ophthalmologists to Consider

As an eye care professional, I understand that complex eye conditions can often be challenging for the layman to comprehend. Therefore, let me break down some recent findings from an extensive database study. The study, carried out retrospectively, focused on patients suffering from keloids who had also undergone repair for retinal detachment (RD).

The study revealed an intriguing correlation. It appears that patients with keloids who underwent RD repair are more likely to develop a condition called proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). However, the mechanisms behind this correlation are quite complex and need further investigation.

Let’s delve a little deeper into the structure of the study. The researchers utilized data from the TriNetX database, focusing on patients with uncomplicated RD repair. These individuals were recognised through medical record codes for various procedures like pneumatic retinopexy, primary scleral buckle, or vitrectomy with or without scleral buckle.

Moreover, patients with keloids were identified using codes for hypertrophic scar or scar conditions and fibrosis of skin. In total, the study looked at 33,943 patients with a history of RD repair, out of which 1482 had keloids.

To ensure accurate comparison, the researchers matched the keloid and non-keloid groups based on factors like age, sex, and race, with each cohort comprising 1061 individuals. The criterion for comparison was the development of PVR within six months of primary RD repair.

The results were quite insightful. Within six months of primary RD repair, 9.0% of patients in the keloid group developed PVR, compared to just 4.2% in the non-keloid group. Additionally, a slightly higher percentage of patients in the keloid group required complex RD repair. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

However, it is important to recognise the limitations of such studies. Large databases often lack the ability to assess the impact of potential confounders like cigarette smoking. There might also be inaccuracies in coding. Plus, patients might receive eye and skin evaluations and treatments from institutions outside of the TriNetX network.

In terms of clinical significance, my approach would be to inform patients with keloids about the potential increased risk of developing PVR after retinal detachment repair. They should also be aware of a higher likelihood of requiring further surgery.

I hope this information proves useful and helps you understand the intricacies of eye care a bit better. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to visit my website, Shankar Netrika Eye Centre, or contact me directly.

Dr. Navin Kumar Gupta
http://shankarnetrika.com

Director, Shankar Netrika Medical Retina Specialist Retina Fellow, University of California, Irvine, USA (2008-2010) Research Fellow, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA (2007-2008) Anterior Segment Fellow, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai (2004-2006) Affiliate of SEE International, Santa Barbara, USA Collaborator and Advisor of Phaco Training Program, Anjali Eye Center

Comments are closed for this post.

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

×