Could our visual perception influence complex mental constructs such as paranoia? A recent study done by Yale University suggests that it might. The study, published in the Communications Psychology journal, observed that individuals with higher inclinations towards paranoid thought processes (believing others to mean harm) and teleological thinking (attributing excessive purpose and meaning to events) struggled more with a visual perception task. This task required participants to discern whether one moving dot was chasing another.
This intriguing study, led by Philip Corlett, an associate professor of psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine and member of the Wu Tsai Institute, explores the intersections of vision and cognitive perception. “We’re really interested in how the mind is organized,” Corlett said. He further explained that the study’s findings hint at the possibility of diagnosing illnesses like schizophrenia through simple eye tests in the future.
The study delved into the concept of paranoia and teleological thinking. Both are essentially misinterpretations of intent. While paranoia is a negative perception, teleological thinking is usually positive. Both these thought patterns have connections to psychosis and schizophrenia. Corlett pointed out that hallucinations, often tied to psychosis, usually involve others, suggesting a social component to these visual misinterpretations.
During the task, participants were shown moving dots on a screen. In some instances, one dot chased another, while at other times, there was no chase. Participants had to identify whether a chase was taking place. Those with higher levels of paranoia and teleology were significantly more likely to confidently assert a chase was happening when it wasn’t, indicating a perceived social interaction that did not exist.
Santiago Castiello, the study’s lead author and a postdoctoral researcher in Corlett’s lab, added that the participants were also asked to identify the chasing and the chased dots in further experiments. The results showed a divergence in paranoia and teleology. “People with paranoia were particularly bad at detecting which dot was being chased,” said Castiello. “And people with high teleology were particularly bad at detecting which dot was doing the chasing.”
These distinct differences between paranoia and teleological thinking could have potential implications for diagnosis or treatment. The link to vision could also change our understanding of how the brain develops psychotic symptoms.
“Very few people with congenital blindness develop schizophrenia,” said Castiello. “Finding these social hallucinations in vision makes me wonder if schizophrenia is something that develops through errors in how people sample the visual world.”
While there are no immediate therapeutic implications from these findings, a deeper understanding of these beliefs could aid in developing pharmacological treatments and risk assessments. “One thing we’re thinking about now is whether we can find eye tests that predict someone’s risk for psychosis,” said Corlett. “Maybe there is some very quick perceptual task that can identify when someone might need to talk to a clinician.”
Comments are closed for this post.